Calls with the VPs of Marketing and Heads of Growth who already ran your motion somewhere else.
Go-To-Market Intelligence
We ask the VPs of Marketing and Heads of Growth who already ran your motion somewhere else what worked, what it cost, and what they would not repeat. The channels to avoid are the deliverable, written up as carefully as the ones worth funding.
- Formats
- 5 engagements
- First call
- 3 to 5 business days
- Published studies
- 9
- Commitment
- Per project, no retainer
What This Is
The premiseSomebody selling to your buyer has already spent money answering the question you are about to spend money answering.
Our job is to find those people and get them on a call with you. Former VPs of Marketing, CMOs, Heads of Growth and demand-generation leads at competitors and comparable companies. These are people who held the budget, watched a channel fail, and had to explain it to a board. Alongside them we interview buyers directly, including the ones who chose a competitor and the ones who chose nobody, on where they actually were when they decided to buy.
What comes back is a ranked read on which channels reach your buyer and which cannot, with the reasoning attached to each one. That includes the channel your board is enthusiastic about, if the operators say it will not work. Nine of these engagements are written up in full on this site, so you can see the shape of the output before committing to anything.
The Engagements
5 formatsFive channels tested against one qualified bar. You get a ranking, the reasoning, and a budget plan.
One channel, taken apart by the operators who ran it. Economics, failure modes, preconditions.
Who actually buys, who signs, and where they were before they bought. From buyers, not personas.
Acquisition cost, conversion, cycle length and team shape from companies genuinely like yours.
What The Work Has Shown
Across 9 published studiesThese are patterns from our own engagements, not laws. Every claim below can be checked against the case studies they came from, which is why we publish them.
- 03.1Search demand is the whole question for Google
- Across the nine, paid search won outright twice, lost outright four times, and produced a thin secondary stream in the other three. Both wins came from categories buyers already searched for by name: storage software, a specific skill to learn. Every loss came from a category that did not yet exist in the buyer's head. Budget and creative did not change that in a single case.
- 03.2Paid social splits on whether the buyer is at work
- It carried the consumer engagements, where discovery happens by scrolling. It lost every considered B2B purchase we tested it on: back-office software, enterprise hardware, high-value payments. Fleet safety managers do not buy a wearable device from an Instagram ad.
- 03.3Outbound is the default answer for a nameable buyer
- Where the buyer set was small enough to list, outbound won or shared the win. That covers seven of the nine, including the retail and partner side of two consumer businesses whose customer-facing channel was something else entirely. It is unfashionable and it keeps working, because a defined list is the one asset paid channels cannot replicate.
- 03.4The second channel usually makes the first one affordable
- Referral and partnerships rarely won on their own. They repeatedly turned a working but expensive channel into a cheap one, which is a different and less celebrated kind of win.
- 03.5The bar you measure against decides the answer
- Every study measured to something the client could not fake: a published guide, an activated trial, a launched campaign, a booked pilot, a completed transaction. Sign-ups and clicks would have ranked the channels differently, and wrongly, in most of them.
Channels We Cover
10 acquisition channelsThe read below is what we have seen so far, not a prediction about you. Which of these survives contact with your buyer is the thing the research is for.
Won or shared the win in seven of our nine published channel tests. It suits a buyer you can name and put on a list. When it fails, the list is usually wrong well before the copy is.
Depends entirely on whether people already search for the category. It won outright for self-storage software and live lessons. It lost outright for a creator platform, a new PR marketplace, a social app and a functional drink. The reason was the same every time: nobody searches for a category they have never heard of.
Good at reaching a lot of people cheaply, bad at proving any of them are your buyer. It won for a consumer rewards app and a DTC drink, where people discover things by scrolling. It lost for self-storage software, fleet-safety hardware and escrow payments, where the purchase is considered and the buyer is at work.
Pays back over quarters rather than weeks, which is the wrong shape for a team that needs a channel working by June. Still worth starting early where the category has search demand, because the curve only begins when you do.
Slow to build and awkward to attribute. It also produced the sharpest step change we have seen in these tests, when a single agency partner brought a batch of brands with it. Worth the patience where someone else already aggregates your buyer.
Rarely the first channel and often the cheapest one after the first channel works. In two of our tests it turned an expensive win into an affordable one, because customers who liked the product kept introducing others at close to no cost.
Should be measured on pilots and qualified conversations months later, not badges scanned on the day. For enterprise hardware sold to a short, named buyer list, it beat every paid channel we put against it.
Works where your buyer already gathers. Building the gathering yourself is a different project on a longer timeline, and teams routinely underestimate how much longer.
Distribution you rent rather than own. Fine while it lasts. Price in the risk that the platform changes its ranking, raises its fees, or decides to compete with you directly.
Moves hiring and fundraising more reliably than it moves pipeline. Budget it as a credibility line unless you have evidence of your own that says otherwise.
How It Runs
5 steps, brief to synthesisWe agree in writing what counts as a customer worth acquiring, before anything is tested or anyone is interviewed. Across our published work this has been a published guide, an activated trial, a launched campaign, a booked pilot. Clients want to skip this step. It decides whether the results mean anything.
Week 060-minute scoping call, no commitmentWe find operators who ran your motion at a comparable company, verify their employment history, and check them against the six-month cooling-off rule and our conflict screen. You see anonymised profiles and approve each one before anything is scheduled.
Days 3 to 5You approve every operator before the callOne-hour calls against a written discussion guide you have seen. Join them or take the transcript, whichever suits. Every call is transcribed within one business day and monitored for compliance while it runs.
Weeks 1 to 3Transcript within 1 business dayYou get a short read-out each week while the work is live rather than one reveal at the end. It means you can redirect the research halfway through, which clients do more often than not.
ThroughoutNo surprises at the read-outSynthesis across the set: what cleared the bar, what did not, where operators disagreed with each other, and the reasoning behind everything we tell you to drop. The channels to avoid get written up as carefully as the ones worth funding.
Weeks 3 to 8Ranked channels · budget plan · dissent recordedWho We Ask
Sourcing and screening- +Former VPs of Marketing and CMOs at direct competitors, past the six-month cooling-off window
- +Heads of Growth at comparable companies selling to the same buyer at a similar price point
- +Demand-generation and performance leads who personally held the channel budget
- +Buyers in your target segment, including the ones who chose a competitor and the ones who chose nobody
- +Agency and fractional operators holding comparable data across several accounts
Employment history is verified before an operator is proposed to you, and you approve every profile before a call is scheduled. Experts are at least six months removed from any company they are asked to discuss, no material non-public information may be requested or shared, calls are monitored, and the audit trail is kept for seven years under the FieldSignal compliance framework. What you get is pattern recognition from people who ran the motion, never a sitting insider handing over a live plan.
When Not To Hire Us
Four honest disqualifiersIf the decision is already made and the research is there to ratify it, we are an expensive rubber stamp. Read the published studies and you will notice how often the useful finding was the one the client did not want: budget pulled out of a channel that felt right, a category search strategy abandoned, consumer ads dropped from an enterprise sale.
First calls take three to five business days and a full programme runs weeks, not days. If the spend has to go out on Monday, run it and call us when you want to know why it did or did not work.
We do not sell media, take commission or manage spend, which is exactly why our answer on whether a channel is worth running is worth having. Ask us for a recommendation on who should execute and we will give you one.
Where a channel is being defended by someone senior on grounds other than evidence, research does not usually settle it. We will still do the work, and you should know going in what it can and cannot move.
Work We Have Run
9 anonymised studiesAnonymised composites of go-to-market engagements, written to the same standard as the transcripts library. Each ends with a ranked channel read and an explicit list of what not to fund.
A travel-creator platform tested five channels to find which one actually signed quality, publishing creators.
An AI fashion-imaging SaaS tested five channels to find which one reached brand and e-commerce buyers.
A self-storage management SaaS tested five channels to find where its operator buyers actually convert.
A performance-PR marketplace tested five channels to find which one reached brand and agency buyers.
A live-lessons marketplace tested five channels to find which converted learners and which brought creators.
A fleet driver-safety company tested five channels to find which reached enterprise fleet buyers.
A consumer social-rewards app tested five channels to find which drove installs and which built the partner side.
A DTC wellness-drinks brand tested five channels to find which drove sales and which opened stockists.
A secure-payments fintech tested five channels to find which actually drove completed transactions.
Questions
8 answers- 01Who exactly do you interview?
- Former VPs of Marketing, CMOs, Heads of Growth, demand-generation leads and first marketing hires at companies competing with you or selling to the same buyer at a similar price point. We also interview buyers directly, including the ones who bought from a competitor, and agency operators who hold comparable data across several accounts.
- 02Are these people currently working at my competitors?
- No. Every expert must be at least six months removed from any company they are asked to discuss, measured from their last day of employment, board service or active advisory work. You get pattern recognition from operators who ran the motion, not a sitting insider handing over a live plan. The rule costs less than it sounds: acquisition economics and channel dynamics move far more slowly than quarterly plans do.
- 03Is it legal to ask a competitor's former growth lead how they grew?
- Yes, inside the same framework that governs every FieldSignal call. Experts are six months or more removed from the companies they discuss, no material non-public information may be requested or shared, calls are monitored, and the audit trail is retained for seven years. Out of scope: any current confidential plan, unannounced launch or unreleased figure. If a call drifts toward one, we end it.
- 04How is this different from hiring a growth agency?
- An agency is paid to run a channel, which makes it a poor source of advice on whether that channel should be run at all. We do not sell media, take commission or manage spend. The deliverable is research, and it regularly includes the finding that a channel you were about to fund will not work.
- 05How is it different from a benchmark report I could buy?
- Published benchmarks average across companies that share nothing but a category label, so everyone reading one assumes they sit on the good side of the median. Our numbers come from a screened set of operators matched on buyer, price point and motion, and we publish the sample size next to every range, including when it is twelve rather than fifty.
- 06What if the research says none of our channels will work?
- We deliver it. In practice that result usually means the buyer definition or the positioning is wrong rather than the channels, and the honest next step is the ICP work rather than a second round of the same tests.
- 07How fast does this move?
- First operator calls are typically scheduled within three to five business days of the brief. A single channel teardown runs two to four weeks. A full channel discovery programme has run five to eight weeks across the studies we have published.
- 08Do we have to be a certain size?
- No. The smallest engagement here is a handful of operator calls, and there is no annual minimum, no retainer and no platform fee. FieldSignal exists because the traditional expert networks price this kind of research out of reach for anyone below a certain size.