GTM Channel Discovery: Fleet-Safety Hardware
The company makes a wearable device and dashboard that detects driver drowsiness for commercial fleets. Its buyers are fleet and safety managers at logistics operators. Paid ads were being tried with no clear return. The brief: find which GTM channel works for this enterprise buyer, which doesn't and why.
- Client
- Hardware + SaaS · fleet driver safety
- Sector
- Fleet safety / hardware + SaaS
- Engagement
- GTM channel discovery
- Timeline
- 8 weeks
The Challenge
What was at stakeThe buyer set was small, the deal was considered and the sale involved hardware and a long cycle. The team needed to know whether paid channels could ever reach fleet decision-makers, or whether budget belonged in direct sales and pilots, before spending further on ads.
How We Approached It
4 steps- +Tested five channels to a qualified-pilot goal: cold outbound, industry events, LinkedIn, Google and Meta
- +Aimed outbound at fleet and safety managers at target logistics operators
- +Measured to booked pilots and qualified sales conversations, not clicks
- +Compared paid reach against direct outreach and in-person events
What We Delivered
3 outputs- +A ranked read on which channels produced qualified fleet conversations
- +The reason an enterprise hardware sale resists broad paid channels
- +A plan moving budget from ads into targeted outbound, events and pilots
Outcome
What it changed- +Outbound and industry events won. A small, known set of buyers answered direct outreach and wanted to see the product in person
- +Google and LinkedIn captured a thin stream of intent from fleets already researching fatigue monitoring
- +Meta lost outright: fleet safety managers do not buy enterprise hardware from a social ad
In Their Words
Anonymised, role-based“We were running consumer-style ads for an enterprise fleet sale. The test made the mismatch obvious. Our buyers are a short, named list, and they answer a direct approach, not an Instagram ad.”
Anonymity & Compliance
How this study was producedThis is a representative, anonymised composite of a go-to-market engagement. The client is described by what it does, never named, and the channel results illustrate the pattern we found rather than one account's exact figures. Each study reflects real engagement structure: channels were tested in parallel and measured against qualified pipeline, not vanity metrics. Talk to us about your channel mix.
Related Case Studies
3 similarAn AI fashion-imaging SaaS tested five channels to find which one reached brand and e-commerce buyers.
A performance-PR marketplace tested five channels to find which one reached brand and agency buyers.
A secure-payments fintech tested five channels to find which actually drove completed transactions.