GTM Channel Discovery: Skills Marketplace
The company runs a marketplace for booking live lessons and masterclasses from experts. It has two sides, learners who buy and creators who teach. Growth spend was going out with no clear read on returns. The brief: find which GTM channel works for each side, which doesn't and why.
- Client
- Marketplace · live expert lessons
- Sector
- Marketplace / online learning
- Engagement
- GTM channel discovery
- Timeline
- 6 weeks
The Challenge
What was at stakeA two-sided marketplace has to acquire buyers and supply, and the same channel rarely serves both. The team needed to know where paying learners actually convert, where creators come from and which channels were burning budget on attention that never turned into bookings.
How We Approached It
4 steps- +Split five channels by side: learner demand across Google, Meta, TikTok and SEO; creator supply through referral
- +Measured the demand side to completed bookings, not clicks or views
- +Tested whether learner intent lived in search or could be created on social
- +Read creator acquisition on published, active teachers
What We Delivered
3 outputs- +A ranked read on which channels converted paying learners
- +A clear split between demand-side and supply-side channels
- +The reason social filled the funnel but search closed it
Outcome
What it changed- +Google and SEO won on demand: learners search for the exact skill they want, so intent converted to bookings
- +Meta and TikTok filled the top of the funnel cheaply but rarely closed a booking. Plenty of attention, not much intent to buy
- +Creator referral won on supply: active teachers introduced other experts far cheaper than paid acquisition
In Their Words
Anonymised, role-based“Social gave us cheap attention that never booked. Search gave us people who already wanted the lesson. Once we saw that split, we stopped paying for the wrong half of the funnel.”
Anonymity & Compliance
How this study was producedThis is a representative, anonymised composite of a go-to-market engagement. The client is described by what it does, never named, and the channel results illustrate the pattern we found rather than one account's exact figures. Each study reflects real engagement structure: channels were tested in parallel and measured against qualified pipeline, not vanity metrics. Talk to us about your channel mix.
Related Case Studies
3 similarA travel-creator platform tested five channels to find which one actually signed quality, publishing creators.
A consumer social-rewards app tested five channels to find which drove installs and which built the partner side.
A DTC wellness-drinks brand tested five channels to find which drove sales and which opened stockists.