GTM Channel Discovery

Most teams find their channel by spending across four at once and reading the wreckage six months later. This does the same job deliberately. We agree a qualified-customer bar you cannot fake, test the candidate channels against it in parallel, cut each one the moment its signal stalls, and write up why every channel won or lost. Nine of these are published on the site, so you can see the shape of the output before you commit to anything.

Timeline
5 to 8 weeks
Pricing
Quoted per scope
Commitment
Per project, no retainer
01/

Who We Ask

Sourcing and screening

Every expert is at least six months removed from any company they are asked to discuss. No material non-public information may be requested or shared, calls are monitored, and the audit trail is kept for seven years under the FieldSignal compliance framework.

02/

When To Run It

6 trigger moments
03/

Questions We Put To Them

6 examples
Q.01

What counts as a customer worth acquiring, and what have we been counting instead?

Q.02

Where does this buyer go when they decide to solve this problem?

Q.03

Does search intent for this category already exist, or would we be creating the demand?

Q.04

Which channels can isolate this buyer, and which can only reach a crowd containing them?

Q.05

At what cost per qualified customer does each channel stop making sense?

Q.06

What would have to be true for the channel we are least excited about to win?

04/

What You Get

Deliverables
05/

What We Need From You

Before the kick-off
06/

Channels To Avoid

Findings we deliver as often as wins
06.1
Paid search where no intent exists

This is the single most common negative finding in our published work. Four of nine engagements ended with Google ruled out, and the reason never varied. Buyers do not search for a category they have not heard of, so there is no demand to capture and the auction just bills you for finding out.

06.2
Broad paid social for a considered B2B purchase

It lost in every considered B2B test we ran it in, including back-office software, fleet hardware and high-value payments. Reach stays cheap and qualification does not, so cost per qualified customer lands several times above the headline cost per lead.

06.3
Influencer spend without a fit test first

Audience size is not audience relevance, and the spend is usually justified after the fact by impressions, which is why it survives longer than it should. It worked well for a DTC drink and produced very little for a creator platform, and the difference was whether the audience contained buyers.

06.4
SEO as the first channel

It compounds, which means it pays late. A team that needs a working channel this quarter and picks content will spend two quarters finding that out. Start it early by all means, but do not count it as the answer to the immediate question.

06.5
Everything at twenty percent of budget

Splitting spend evenly across five channels means none of them reaches the volume needed to read a signal. It looks prudent in a board deck and it produces five inconclusive results instead of one useful one.

06.6
Brand spend before a channel works

Brand makes a working channel cheaper. It does not make a broken one work, and it is close to impossible to hold accountable while you are still looking for the first channel that converts.

07/

A Worked Example

Anonymised, published in full
07.0
A platform for travel creators
The situation
The company let travel creators build and sell interactive guides to their followers. Growth depended on signing creators who already had an audience. Budget was approved and could not be spread five ways on faith.
What we did
We tested five channels against one bar: creators who actually published a guide, rather than anyone who signed up. Each channel was cut the moment its qualified-signup signal stalled.
What came back
Outbound won, and referral made it cheaper still because the creators who joined kept introducing others for almost nothing. Google lost outright. Creators do not search for a way to sell travel guides, so there was no intent to capture. Meta and broad influencer spend could not isolate creators with real audiences, so cost per active creator ran too high.
08/

What This Will Not Tell You

Limits, stated upfront

Every research method has a boundary. Here is where this one sits, so you can decide before you commission it rather than find out at the read-out.

08.1
A test tells you about the version you tested

A channel can fail on the offer, the creative, the list or the landing page rather than on the channel itself. We separate these where the data allows and flag it plainly when we cannot.

08.2
Some channels cannot be read in eight weeks

SEO, community and most partnerships pay back over quarters. We can assess whether they are worth starting and what they would cost, but a short test will not tell you what they return.

08.3
Thin budget produces a thin answer

Below a certain spend the result is noise wearing the costume of a finding. We will tell you before we start if the budget cannot support a readable test, which sometimes means recommending you do not run one yet.

08.4
Sometimes the honest answer is that none of them work

That is usually a positioning or ICP problem in a channel costume. We say so and point you at the buyer research rather than sell a second round of the same test.

09/

Where We Have Run This

3 anonymised studies
GTM-01
TRAVEL-CREATOR PLATFORM · CHANNEL TEST
Creator platform · travel guides

A travel-creator platform tested five channels to find which one actually signed quality, publishing creators.

GTM-03
SELF-STORAGE SAAS · CHANNEL TEST
Vertical SaaS · self-storage operators

A self-storage management SaaS tested five channels to find where its operator buyers actually convert.

GTM-09
ESCROW PAYMENTS FINTECH · CHANNEL TEST
Fintech · escrow for high-value sales

A secure-payments fintech tested five channels to find which actually drove completed transactions.

10/

Questions

6 answers
01Do you run the ads yourselves?
No. We design the test, agree the qualified bar, set the stop conditions and read the result. Execution runs through your team or your agency. We do not sell media, take commission or manage spend, which is the whole reason our answer on whether a channel is worth running is worth having.
02What counts as a qualified customer?
Whatever you cannot fake. Across the nine published studies it has been a published guide, an activated trial, a launched campaign, a booked pilot and a completed transaction. In B2B software it is usually a qualified opportunity rather than a demo request. Agreeing this is most of the work, and skipping it is why so many channel tests are unreadable afterwards.
03Why five channels?
It is what has fitted the budget and the calendar in practice, not a rule. Five is enough to cover the plausible candidates and few enough that each one gets the volume it needs to be readable. If your situation only has three realistic candidates we will test three and say so.
04What if the answer is that none of the channels work?
We deliver it. It has usually meant the buyer definition or the positioning is wrong rather than the channels, and the right next step is the ICP work, not another round of tests.
05How much budget do the tests need?
It depends on your price point and how many buyers exist, so we size it with you before starting. The honest version: if the budget cannot get each paid channel to a readable signal, the test will produce noise, and we would rather tell you that upfront than take the fee.
06Can we run this while our current channels keep going?
Yes, and most clients do. The tests run alongside whatever is already working. We only ask that you do not change the existing spend mid-test, because it makes the comparison unreadable.
11/

Related Engagements

3 suggestions
03
CHANNEL TEARDOWNS
Timeline · 2 to 4 weeks

One channel, taken apart by the operators who ran it. Economics, failure modes, preconditions.

01
GROWTH OPERATOR INTERVIEWS
Timeline · 3 to 5 days to first call

Calls with the VPs of Marketing and Heads of Growth who already ran your motion somewhere else.

05
GTM BENCHMARKS
Timeline · 3 to 6 weeks

Acquisition cost, conversion, cycle length and team shape from companies genuinely like yours.

Brief us on GTM channel discovery.

Response under 4 hours, Mon–Fri. First call in 3 to 5 business days.
Brief Us
© 2026 Growth Insights Limited. All rights reserved.fieldsignalhq.com