Pricing Research: Series A SaaS
The founders suspected they were under-priced, but a reprice done blind risked stalling growth. Before changing the model, they wanted evidence on how target buyers actually value the product, what they would pay, what they would walk from and which features justified a premium. Guessing at price is how good products leak revenue.
- Client
- Series A vertical-SaaS company
- Sector
- Vertical SaaS
- Engagement
- Pricing / willingness-to-pay research
- Timeline
- 2 weeks
The Challenge
What was at stakeThe company was repricing on instinct, not evidence. The founders needed a real read on buyer willingness to pay, price sensitivity and the features that justified a premium, from the exact buyers they sell to. A mispriced reprice could cap growth or trigger churn.
How We Approached It
4 steps- +Framed the research around three questions: willingness to pay, price sensitivity and premium drivers
- +Sourced ten target buyers matching the company's core segment
- +Ran structured willingness-to-pay interviews rather than open-ended feedback
- +Screened for buyers with real budget authority, not end users
What We Delivered
3 outputs- +Ten buyer interviews plus a willingness-to-pay range by segment
- +A read on which features buyers would actually pay a premium for
- +The price points most likely to trigger churn or resistance
Outcome
What it changed- +The company repriced upward, but tiered the model to each segment's distinct willingness to pay
- +Two features assumed to be premium turned out to be table stakes, and were bundled
- +The reprice landed without the churn the founders had feared
In Their Words
Anonymised, role-based“We were about to reprice on a hunch. Ten of our actual buyers told us where the ceiling really was, and which features they'd never pay extra for. That saved us from a churn event.”
Anonymity & Compliance
How this study was producedThis is a representative, anonymised composite of a typical startups & scale-ups engagement. Client identity is removed and the figures illustrate the format and scale of the work. They are not a record of a single named mandate. Every expert call is scoped to general market knowledge, screened for material non-public information before findings reach a deal team, and documented for audit. See our compliance framework for full detail.
Related Case Studies
3 similarA seed marketplace validated supply-side buy-in before scaling demand, via interviews with target suppliers.
A seed fund pressure-tested a vertical-SaaS thesis with five operator calls before IC, turnaround under two weeks.
Before leading a healthtech Series A, a sector fund ran a teardown with the clinicians and buyers who actually evaluate the category.