Pricing Research: Series A SaaS
The founders suspected they were under-priced, but a reprice done blind risked stalling growth. Before changing the model, they wanted evidence on how target buyers actually value the product: what they would pay, what they would walk from and which features justify a premium. Guessing at price is how good products leak revenue.
- Client
- Series A vertical-SaaS company
- Sector
- Vertical SaaS
- Engagement
- Pricing / willingness-to-pay research
- Timeline
- 2 weeks
The Challenge
What was at stakeThe company was repricing on instinct, not evidence. The founders needed a real read on buyer willingness to pay, price sensitivity and the features that justified a premium, from the exact buyers they sell to. A mispriced reprice could cap growth or trigger churn.
How We Approached It
4 steps- +Framed the research around three questions: willingness to pay, price sensitivity and premium drivers
- +Sourced ten target buyers matching the company's core segment
- +Ran structured willingness-to-pay interviews rather than open-ended feedback
- +Screened for buyers with real budget authority, not end users
What We Delivered
3 outputs- +Ten buyer interviews plus a willingness-to-pay range by segment
- +A read on which features buyers would actually pay a premium for
- +The price points most likely to trigger churn or resistance
Outcome
What it changed- +The company repriced upward, but tiered the model to each segment's distinct willingness to pay
- +Two features assumed to be premium turned out to be table stakes, and were bundled
- +The reprice landed without the churn the founders had feared
In Their Words
Anonymised, role-based“We were about to reprice on a hunch. Ten of our actual buyers told us where the ceiling really was, and which features they'd never pay extra for. That saved us from a churn event.”
Anonymity & Compliance
How this study was producedThis is a representative, anonymised composite of a typical startups & scale-ups engagement. Client identity is removed and the figures illustrate the format and scale of the work. They are not a record of a single named mandate. Every expert call is scoped to general market knowledge, screened for material non-public information before findings reach a deal team, and documented for audit. See our compliance framework for full detail.
Related Case Studies
3 similarA seed marketplace validated supply-side buy-in before scaling demand, via interviews with target suppliers.
A seed fund pressure-tested a vertical-SaaS thesis with five operator calls before IC, all in under two weeks.
Before leading a healthtech Series A, a sector fund ran a teardown with the clinicians and buyers who actually evaluate the category.