Tegus (now part of AlphaSense) built the largest searchable transcript library in the category — AI-indexed, investor-workflow-first. FieldSignal's custom calls + lightweight transcript library are positioned for buyers who need bespoke sourcing more than searchable archives.
Pick Tegus if you're an active buy-side analyst consuming 100+ transcripts a year. Pick FieldSignal if your workflow is custom calls with opportunistic transcript browsing.
Audit your last 12 months of Tegus usage — transcripts read vs custom calls
If custom calls > 30% of value, FieldSignal likely cheaper at lower commitment
Add FieldSignal as second vendor — don't drop Tegus mid-cycle
Sign single MSA, €99/mo transcript add-on optional
First custom call inside 72h
Is FieldSignal's transcript library competitive with Tegus?
No, not on volume or AI search. Tegus has 100,000+ transcripts and best-in-class AI indexing. Our library is positioned as opportunistic browsing at a fraction of the price, not a Tegus replacement.
What if I love AlphaSense + Tegus integrated?
Stay. The unified document + transcript search is genuinely best-in-class for equity research workflows. FieldSignal doesn't compete on that axis.
Can FieldSignal handle bespoke expert sourcing better than Tegus?
Yes — custom sourcing is our core product. Tegus supports it but their growth story is the searchable library, not bespoke calls.
Why is FieldSignal so much cheaper for transcripts?
Because we're not selling AI search or analyst-curated metadata. €99/mo gets you searchable raw transcripts. If you need Tegus-level tooling, the price gap is justified.
Honest head-to-head on price, network depth, turnaround and compliance. When GLG is right. When FieldSignal is.
Where AlphaSights' speed and account model wins. Where FieldSignal's per-call pricing and senior contact win. Honest comparison.
Third Bridge's Forum library vs FieldSignal's custom calls + lightweight transcripts. Where each genuinely wins.